Paris and Melun Minimum Temperatures During the June 2026 Heatwave
Paris-Montsouris had the higher daily minimum on every day of June 2026 in the Météo-France records checked here. Across 30 matched dates, its minimum was 2.7°C warmer on average than Melun-Villaroche’s. The largest gap was 5.1°C on June 26.
That is a persistent difference between two observing sites. It is not an estimate for the whole city or for every rural location. It gives a useful local view of warmth during the June heatwave, while leaving open how much of the gap came from urban surroundings, station exposure or local weather.
June 26 had the largest gap, not the highest Paris minimum
Paris reached its highest daily minimum, 26.4°C, on June 25. Melun’s minimum that day was 22.2°C, leaving a 4.2°C gap. On June 26, Paris’s minimum was slightly lower at 26.2°C, but Melun’s fell to 21.1°C. The resulting gap widened to 5.1°C.
The hottest minimum and the largest station difference therefore occurred on different dates. Looking only at the Paris curve would miss that distinction. Looking only at two separate anomaly curves would also be misleading: if each station has a different normal, the distance between those curves is not the observed temperature difference.
Why compare these two stations?
Paris-Montsouris is an urban park station, with Météo-France provider ID 75114001. Melun-Villaroche, provider ID 77306001, is about 35 kilometres southeast. Nogueira and colleagues’ Paris urban-climate study used Montsouris and Melun as an urban–rural pair, while noting the limitations of a two-point comparison.
A park measurement cannot describe every street, home or neighbourhood. Nor does subtracting two daily minima give the temperature difference at one shared hour: the minima may occur at different times. The defensible result here is the difference between the stations’ daily minimum statistics.
Reproduce the comparison
Select Paris-Montsouris and Melun-Villaroche in the Météo-France Explorer for June 1–30. The observation guide covers station selection and export. The 30-row extract includes each station’s minimum and maximum, plus the calculated minimum-temperature difference.
For each date, subtract Melun’s TN from Paris’s TN, then average the 30 differences. That gives 2.7167°C, reported as 2.7°C. The source files contained both variables for both stations on all 30 dates; no missing day was interpolated.
Conclusion
Comparing Paris-Montsouris and Melun-Villaroche across June 2026 illustrates the consistent nocturnal thermal signature of an urban park relative to an outlying rural airfield. Paris recorded a higher daily minimum on all 30 days of the month, averaging a 2.7°C nocturnal excess. The divergence peaked at 5.1°C on 26 June during calm, clear heatwave conditions that favored strong radiational cooling in open rural terrain while heat remained trapped in the urban fabric. This two-station comparison quantifies the difference between two documented sensor environments, but does not measure temperature variability across every street canyon or microclimate within metropolitan Paris.
Editor’s note: Data current as of June 30, 2026. Daily minimum and maximum series for both stations were rechecked against retained Météo-France departmental source files on September 13, 2026. Operational data remain subject to subsequent quality control.
Data Annex
| Station | Météo-France ID | Latitude | Longitude | Elevation | Role |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paris-Montsouris | 75114001 | 48.8217° N | 2.3378° E | 75 m | Urban park |
| Melun-Villaroche | 77306001 | 48.6017° N | 2.6733° E | 90 m | Rural comparison |
| Date in June | Paris minimum (°C) | Melun minimum (°C) | Paris − Melun (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 14.7 | 11.4 | 3.3 |
| 02 | 16.1 | 15.4 | 0.7 |
| 03 | 13.5 | 11.0 | 2.5 |
| 04 | 14.7 | 14.0 | 0.7 |
| 05 | 11.6 | 9.6 | 2.0 |
| 06 | 13.1 | 10.6 | 2.5 |
| 07 | 10.3 | 7.9 | 2.4 |
| 08 | 14.3 | 12.2 | 2.1 |
| 09 | 10.7 | 9.0 | 1.7 |
| 10 | 12.6 | 10.8 | 1.8 |
| 11 | 10.3 | 6.6 | 3.7 |
| 12 | 16.7 | 15.3 | 1.4 |
| 13 | 16.3 | 13.4 | 2.9 |
| 14 | 14.5 | 10.4 | 4.1 |
| 15 | 14.2 | 11.1 | 3.1 |
| 16 | 20.4 | 17.8 | 2.6 |
| 17 | 17.3 | 14.3 | 3.0 |
| 18 | 18.7 | 16.0 | 2.7 |
| 19 | 20.6 | 17.6 | 3.0 |
| 20 | 20.6 | 17.5 | 3.1 |
| 21 | 21.4 | 20.0 | 1.4 |
| 22 | 24.2 | 20.8 | 3.4 |
| 23 | 24.1 | 20.0 | 4.1 |
| 24 | 25.4 | 20.6 | 4.8 |
| 25 | 26.4 | 22.2 | 4.2 |
| 26 | 26.2 | 21.1 | 5.1 |
| 27 | 22.5 | 19.9 | 2.6 |
| 28 | 21.6 | 18.7 | 2.9 |
| 29 | 17.2 | 16.6 | 0.6 |
| 30 | 17.0 | 13.9 | 3.1 |
The calculation uses TN and TX from the Department 75 and 77 daily source files, matched by provider ID and AAAAMMJJ. It preserves the provider’s daily dates rather than constructing UTC minima from hourly reports. The reported mean is unweighted across the 30 paired days. Daily observations can be revised by Météo-France.
Data Sources
- Météo-France daily climate dataset: provider-format departmental files used for the calculation.
- Nogueira et al. (2022), Geoscientific Model Development: precedent and limitations for the Montsouris–Melun comparison.

